Arthur, > It's simply unfathomable that you went ahead and did it again a second > time.
You are right, I missed your post and my apologies for that. Having said that, I'm not interested in arguing, but in doing. And since *nobody* rejected my proposal (on the contrary, “it would make sense to leave the format alone and load everything at runtime depending on what's available”) I just proceeded. Even if you needn't it, since I'm interested in doing, my offer still stands. Cheers Javier
