On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:20:14AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:09:21AM -0500, Herbert Schulz wrote: > > > On Aug 31, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > <dvi_minimal.tex> > > > > Howdy, > > > > I guess I wouldn't expect dvips to understand anything about Unicode and it > > looks like it's trying to use Computer Modern since it has no idea about > > OTF fonts either. > > OK good to know that dvips does not give much information about whether > the DVI produced is correct.
To be clear I'm not directly concerned with dvips. I am just curious if the DVI output produced from dviluatex with the minimal example is expected. But I understand that DVI is not a high priority. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
