> Am 04.06.2017 um 13:26 schrieb Dirk Laurie <[email protected]>: > > 2017-06-03 22:11 GMT+02:00 Patrick Gundlach <[email protected]>: > >>> a sample lua script runs twice slower with texlua of TL2017 >>> than with the texlua from TL2016 and bare lua 5.3.3 I also >>> have on my mac os x 10.9.5 >> >> >> I am not sure if this is still relevant (I haven't followed the whole >> discussion). Anyway: on my system (latest Mac Laptop with up to date >> software) I have the same results with tl2017 and tl2016 (minor differences >> of course): >> >> >> $ time texlua collatz.lua >> >> real 0m14.837s >> user 0m14.552s >> sys 0m0.106s >> >> $ time texluajit collatz.lua >> >> real 0m10.231s >> user 0m10.205s >> sys 0m0.012s > > I don't think it is a fair or even relevant test of texlua to use it on > a CPU-intensive job involving no string processing whatsover, > especially one that is easy and natural to do directly in C.
... I don't understand your comment, could you elaborate? I just wanted to state that tl2016 and tl2017 have the same processing time, with and without jit. Patrick
