time() returns seconds, so i don't think it's precise enough for him. As an aside, time() takes a pointer so (imo) it's better to use NULL instead of 0 (Unless of course you are using C++), or time(&x) willI'm pretty sure in a C class we once used something like x=time(0). It might require time.h or clock.h or something. But that was a long time ago.
work, too. --Ray
