On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 16:02, Vince Hoang wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:02:44PM -0500, MonMotha wrote: > > I didn't notice we changed the reply-to header and replied only > > to virgil directly. > > That must have just changed recently due to some gentle prodding. > Now I have to update my mutt config to munge my To: address > properly again. > > -Vince
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I have changed the setting as part of a test based upon the rationale within this page. http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml This is some counter rationale as to why reply-to-list is good. I'll leave it this way for a few weeks and see how it goes. Basically if you want to reply to the list, use "Reply All" rather than "Reply" in your mailer. Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
