On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:45:48AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > R.Scott Belford wrote: > >With time, though, enough money will be gathered to buy > >a matching larger drive ($177), and hopefully more. When > >that time comes we can move to faster drives as Vince has > >suggested. The 160gb drive had a great price point, and it > >really isn't that bad, is it? > > Granted I make a lot of stubborn decisions too, but I believe I > have the technical correctness to back it up, so I am correct > at least 95% of the time.
But you forget to compromise on that remaining 5%. Instead of looking at it like Scott bought the "wrong" drive, think if it as him helping out with the alternative that I suggested. Now, another donor has the choice of purchasing a 60GB _or_ a 160GB drive. Either way, videl gets a paired root disk and a lot more diskspace. -Vince
