Tim Newsham wrote:
The latest in this sad saga:
http://www.ht-technology.com/cherryos-pearpc/cherryos-pearpc.html
There seem to be a lot more than that one page:
http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/000501.html
If you follow the links in any of these pages, you can find more and
more. Some of this may not be proven in a legal sense, but I think its
unlikely that there's no code shared between the two.
I suppose some of these may be libraries automatically added by
compilers for all I know, but some of it looks pretty bad.
-Eric Hattemer
I'm not saying that he is wrong, but I dont find his current
argument or his methods very convincing. If he (and others)
are wrong, I would hate to be the one facing an overly rabid
open source mob.
Tim N.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau
