On Jun 14, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Tim Newsham wrote:
Open, but not Free.Free for my eyes, which is cheaper than it was yesterday.
The CDDL is yet another reason why the OSI (started by Perens, Raymond and others to "re-brand" Free Software) was a really
bad (and dangerous) idea.I complained to Larry Rosen (who approved CDDL as an OSI-compliant license) and others about this back at TPOSSCON.
I'm concerned about "Free as in speech". Its not clear that the CDDL permits software Freedom.
Jim
