Eric Hattemer wrote:
Ok, I wonder if I'm the only one who immediately read this as what I thought it should have been, then didn't get the criticism. The typo should have readfor i in m*; do rm $i; done; -Eric Hattemer
You're exactly right. Wayne
Eric Hattemer wrote:
Ok, I wonder if I'm the only one who immediately read this as what I thought it should have been, then didn't get the criticism. The typo should have readfor i in m*; do rm $i; done; -Eric Hattemer
You're exactly right. Wayne