Peter Besenbruch wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 02:05 -1000, Jim Thompson wrote:
Question: You're a Fortune 1000 company... you want to deploy some
linux, but you require rock-solid support from a company
with real assets and a real reputation. Your choices are:
Red Hat, Canonical (Ubuntu), Sun (Ubuntu), Novel or Oracle.
Who do you choose?
Julian Yap wrote:
I wouldn't say that Oracle has proven anything with their Linux support.
I might take that a step further. I have yet to see a company manage
security updates more slowly, or more sloppily than Oracle. If that in
any way predicts what their Linux support will be like, then they should
be chosen for mission critical systems.
There should be a "not" in there, as in "...they should NOT be chosen..."
--
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
