So, let me get this straight. What are we talking about here? ONE security 'hole' or exploit every FIVE YEARS? As opposed to ONE "hole" punched in Windows OS every FIVE MINUTES? (Or less?)

No brainer if you ask me. I think they're making way too much of such a little thing comparatively speaking. (actually there is no comparison) :)

Whatdayathink Jim? :)

Bully



Jim Thompson wrote:

On Aug 6, 2007, at 1:09 PM, 808blogger wrote:

well.... Keep in mind no other OS has even a close record  to what the
openbsd team has done.

Please.

And dont forget that the ssh you use everyday is
written by the openbsd team, thats right. Theo and co. have done a HUGE job
improving security the unix world at large.

So what? There were RSA-keyed, encrypted telnets in-existence before ssh got written. (Under my watch, by Doug Barnes, at Tadpole, circa 1994. Doug later of 'C2' fame.)

and on the topic of this particular exploit, you would actaully have to be on the same physical LAN segment to use this exploit. this is a not an "over
the internet" hack that can occur

to quote from http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5HP0C1FKUO.html

"However, in order to exploit a vulnerable system an attacker needs to be able to inject fragmented IPv6 packets on the target system's local network. This requires direct physical/logical access to the target's local network
-in which case the attacking system does not need to have a working IPv6
stack- or the ability to route or tunnel IPv6 packets to the target from a
remote network."

"logical"... if your router manages to create a tunnel for you, you're hosed.

Its **SPIN**, get it?

99% of users will not even have a a problem with this and
you dont even have to patch the system if you dont want to  simply put
'block in quick inet6' in your pf.conf

Right, but the claim is "default installation", and they didn't want to lose that.

(and let us not forget that the other bug was in (drumroll) ssh)

dont dump on the openbsd guys..... their product rocks.

their process for security bugs appears to be quite badly borked.

and FreeBSD rocks much, much harder.

Jim
_______________________________________________
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau

















































































































































































_______________________________________________
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau

Reply via email to