If you want file services, the infrant (now netgear) was designed by ibm 
storage systems guys and is very nice...but it's not a general purpose linux 
box.

i'm waiting to see how the new nano itx boards look to see how i can build a 
super small and low power (electrical) server. If power consumption and noise 
is less of an issue, i lover supermicro....the new short case rack jobs (1ru) 
is less expensive than name brand, but still are certified for vmware esx 
server with all the vtc cpu extensions.

Brian chee

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael J Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 5:31 PM
To: LUAU <[email protected]>
Subject: [LUAU] Low-cost Linux hardware


Of late, i've grown tired of making a Mac do weird server things.
(ie, making 10.3.9 client behave like a full-blown server, etc.)

What's best these days for a cheap, headless Linux server to use for  
setting up a small server or cluster?
No need, as such, just yet, for RAID.
Although I would prefer something that fits in a rack, and that was  
inexpensive.

Suggestions?
Is there any local supplier of such things?

Aloha mai Nai`a!
-- 
"Please have your Internet License             http://kapu.net/~mjwise/
   and Usenet Registration handy..."




_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau

Reply via email to