On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Sugar<david.su...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Lol!  While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to
> have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!

Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start
to build a strong and broad community, that can take care of tasks.
For example Debian packages that have been made available during
recent months by Andrew Lee and others were also planned and released
to lay the groundwork for lubuntu.

> I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is
> actually very correct.

How should a formalizing governance look like? Is it necessary at this stage?

> However, the meta package (any meta-package
> instance) has a "snapshot" instance of the seed; it does not pull or re-
> germinate it when it builds.  Hence, as long as it is safe at the time
> of submission, a given update of the package will be safe, well, at
> least for the current one.  Also, we could setup a separate release
> subteam that is not open commit, and have it moved to there.  I think we
> should hold a quick IRC meeting in any case to ratify some basic
> governance...

I suggest to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu
on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT

Please help to set up an agenda:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC_Meeting_September_6, 2009

Please also have a look at existing IRC meet ups to understand
decisions that have been made for reasons stated in previous meet up
logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC_Meetings

- Mario

Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to