Hi, can you confirm that doing so will not, as has been reported as a bug cause any issues with updates / upgrading?
Thabks, Phill. On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Andrew Woodhead < andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote: > As Jaeic says, removing metapackages is harmless, they are hollow and > empty and o not remove the packages they install so are fine to remove, this > is the same with any metapackage > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Phillip Whiteside <phi...@phillw.net>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I guess this is more a question for Juliene, but one of things that has >> been raised a few times on IRC is why lubuntu *insists *on having all the >> packages that it does, for example you cannot remove Mplayer to free room up >> and put an alternative on, nor xfburn if you wish brasserro. Whilst the list >> of default packages is commendable, it does seem somewhat odd that none of >> them may be removed without it taking out the whole of lubuntu. >> >> The argument of 'more difficult to support' does not really stand, people >> want to make their computer their own, the whole idea of *buntu is choice, >> we can easily say that we cannot support xyz, but forcing people to have >> applications on that they do not want seems odd. >> >> Regards, >> >> Phill. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop >> Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
