+1 for file-roller > xarchiver bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xarchiver/+bug/681400
bug in file-roller not present on NFS network share ________________________________ From: Yorvyk <yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com> To: lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 9:20:10 PM Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Applications by default: Replace xarchiver by file-roller On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:35:24 +0000 Yorvyk <yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 03:43:00 -0800 (PST) > Stevo Vukovic <stevovuko...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > -1 > > Recently, file-roller has an bug (repeated regression) when extracting > > multi-part rar from network share (samba, sftp...). Better stick with >xarchiver > > > for some time. > > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/639883 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/386795 > > > > > > > At first I thought this problem wasn’t worth worrying about until I realised >it’s what I normally do. I download files to my server then extract them to >the >machine I intend to use them on. Hopefully the regression will revert during >Natty’s development > > > Forgot to add my benchmarks. Both take around 12-14 MiB but, Xarchiver is a slow CPU hog taking 4½ mins. to extract an 84 MiB ISO from a BZ2 file using 70% CPU while file-roller took 40 secs. and used 45% CPU. This was teh worst of 3 tests but Xarchiver was quite a bit slower throughout. Lets hope file-roller gets sorted. -- Steve Cook (Yorvyk) http://lubuntu.net _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp