Le Wednesday 08 June 2011 à 23:26 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit : > I've been running Ubuntu Oneiric with lightdm for a while and it > appears to behave it's self OK. > Having had a bit of a read about it I don't see an advantage in > either, from a user's point of view, and I'm a bit lost with the > technical (dis)advantages. > A few thoughts. With the change to GTK3 and the potential problems to > be resolved with that, are we adding another headache for the few > competent devs we have. > Or would having Lightdm give us one less problem, as others in the > Ubuntu community would be dealing with it and we wouldn't have to > worry about lxdm either. > Would sticking with what we know be better as lxdm doesn't have any > real problems and performs the function for which it is intended.
In the past, we discovered some bugs in LXDM which was quite painful to investigate and fix. With a DM used by more people, and more developed, we decrease this kind of risk. Regards, Julien Lavergne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
