Le 26 nov. 2011 à 11:49, Leszek Lesner <leszek.les...@web.de> a écrit :
> Am 26.11.2011 11:18, schrieb Julien Lavergne: >> Le 11/26/2011 10:36 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit : >>> On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote: >>> >>>> No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific >>>> packages are involved. >>> >>> OK, that helps. Is there documentation out there somewhere about what >>> to replace glade with? Examples, tutorials, whatever? Is using glade >>> 3.10.x (and so GTK3) sufficient? Or are we really "killing" glade? >> No, just using GtkBuilder instead of glade should be fine : >> http://developer.gnome.org/gtk/2.24/gtk-migrating-GtkBuilder.html >> > To bring some clearness in here. Glade as the tool to build UIs from > version 2.0 has the capability to use gtkbuilder to build its ui forms. > Also the ubuntu programming infrastructure quickly uses glade (again the > tool) with its default gtkbuilder capabilities. > So as far as I see it we don't have any big problem or are they UIs that > use the glade library instead the gtkbuilder library in Lubuntu ? (Again > glade library does not mean that they were created with glade) > The goal is to remove the depends on libglade. I think it's pretty useless to use an external library for something provided by gtk itself (unless the support is not complete enough). Regards, Julien Lavergne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp