Indeed! What I was trying to point out is that we should NOT promote one specific procedure to follow, eg; only use test drive w/virtual box.
I tend to focus mostly on installer bugs and often find that I overlook others like this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/1019621 IMHO it's more a matter of recruiting new testers than training the testers. Different testers will focus on different things - because we're all different ;^) Lance --- On Fri, 8/3/12, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: From: Lars Noodén <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: ISO Testing Screencast To: [email protected] Date: Friday, August 3, 2012, 3:16 AM On 8/3/12 6:33 AM, Lance wrote: > IMHO it should be mentioned that testing on actual hardware is preferable to > testing in a VM. I believe a lot of ubiquity and xserver bugs are overlooked > when testing in a VM. > > That said, any testing is preferable to no testing ;^) > > Lance > Also, though VirtualBox is quite nice, using Qemu would allow testing of the PPC architecture, too. At some point Ubuntu, and thus Lubuntu, will probably offer ARM officially, so we should try to be prepared. Regards, /Lars -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
