Lance, the bug mentioned -- is it perhaps something in plymouth? BTW,
please do suggest any additional improvements to the bug reporting. It's
easy to change! I learned the +fileabug links I was promoting don't work
for people trying to file, so they are gone. Regardless, as always best
to get the bug filed. Even if you have to ask for help to do so :-)
Nicholas
On 08/30/2012 06:00 PM, Lance wrote:
Something that is NOT mentioned here is the importance of filing every
single bug encountered, even if you're not sure what package is
actually the cause.
A good example is this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/+bug/1041625
I honestly don't think it's an "openchrome" problem so much as how we
now handle non-3D-capable graphics since Ubuntu dropped unity-2d and
metacity.
But we all owe Lars a big round of applause for filing the original
bug :^)
I've added lots of info but there's still no response from someone
knowledgeable enough to try and nail down the problem.
I can't help but feel that posts like this are trying to scapegoat the
testing community while the real problem lies with design and
development :^(
Lance
--- On *Thu, 8/30/12, Phill Whiteside /<[email protected]>/* wrote:
From: Phill Whiteside <[email protected]>
Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Reporting Bugs
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, August 30, 2012, 2:38 PM
Hi Guys,
I know for some this is second nature; but for us mere mortals do
take a read of the below.
Regards,
Phill.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Nicholas Skaggs* <[email protected]
</mc/[email protected]>>
Date: 30 August 2012 16:56
Subject: Reporting Bugs
To: Ubuntu QA <[email protected]
</mc/[email protected]>>
I'm happy to report we're doing excellent work on finding bugs :-)
Up until now, many of our bugs have been filed only against
ubiquity, which then requires someone to manually triage if it's
not a ubiquity bug.
Since we know it's important to file the bug properly in order to
get the bug seen and fixed, I worked with one of the ubiquity
developers to put together a handy chart to help you when filing
iso tracker bugs. This way, you can file it against the proper
package and increase the odds it will be seen by the right
developers in order to be worked and fixed. With that in mind,
check out an example of what the bug reporting page now looks like:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/22117/buginstructions
Additionally, I would encourage all of you to read some of the
bugsquad documentation on reporting bugs;
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage
Think of this as essential reading for being a better bug reporter
:-) Don't worry! I'm also still learning, and I trust I'm becoming
better with each bug I file. The key is to put forth your best
effort each time, and keep filing bugs. You'll learn as time goes
on. Also, note that the bugsquad maintains an IRC channel as well
#ubuntu-bugs, and can help support you should you run into some
specific trouble on filing. As always, everyone on this list is
also here to help.
I hope these instructions clear some of the confusion surrounding
what to do when something breaks during iso testing. Thanks!
Nicholas
--
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
[email protected] </mc/[email protected]>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
--
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
<https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
Post to : [email protected]
</mc/[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
<https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
