Hi, upon further investigation, the failure of the iso's being built was down to a mis-understanding. Keeping you good testers "in the loop" has been made more important.
Please do start testing [1]. Please do let me know if the re spins do not carry bugs over. Thanks, Phill. 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/232/builds On 3 September 2012 19:41, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys & gals, > > maybe that should read 'lack of Beta 1 QA release'... Yes, something got > very very broken. As it is an extended holiday in USA, it could not have > fallen at a worse time. > > I'm a firm believer in Bad news first, followed by Good news :) > > Bad News: > > To give some idea as to how bad things happened, one of the re spins is on > .7 (Yes, that is 7 re spins in the same day). I have refrained from nagging > the -release team as the last thing they need is me distracting them. I'm > sure a post-mortum will be held, but that is for another day. > > The -release team are working really hard to get the iso's back up. In > fairness, a lot of this is not their fault so please don't blame them. > > I appreciate that not knowing what is going on can be frustrating; to that > end can I remind you good people that we are allowed to log onto the pad > area [1] on pain of death that we do NOT do edits. That area gives you the > most up to date information as to what is happening. > > Good News: > > The bugs from previous spins are now carried over as 'be aware' section. > That is actually no mean feat and addresses one of the major complaints > that have been raised about re spins wiping out all previous bug reports. > [2] > > Thanks, > > Phill. > > 1. http://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-release > 2. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/232/builds > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
