Hi Erick, any particular reason for skipping some of the alpha's?
Regards, Phill. On 10 May 2013 07:03, Erick Brunzell <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 05/09/2013 12:36 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > > 2013/5/9 Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> <phi...@ubuntu.com>: > > Hi Julien, > > I note that there is, once again, provision for alphas in the Saucy time > line[1]. I don't feel that Cadence worked well for us last cycle, as it > seems to concentrate on ubuntu / unity issues. Because of this, I'd suggest > that we revert back to what worked well for us pre 10.04. When do you have > make a decision by? (i.e. is there time to discuss this with the lubuntu > testers). > > I'm fine with doing Alphas this cycle, as long as we have enough > testers to test most of ISO for each Alpha. Any opinions from others > testers ? > > Regards, > Julien Lavergne > > > If these dates are correct I'd think we'd either want to skip Alpha 2 or > Alpha 3: > > Alpha 1 June 20th > > Alpha 2 July 18th > > Alpha 3 August 1st > > Beta 1 September 5th > > Final Beta September 26th > > Final October 17th > > Lance > > PS: I'd prefer we skip Alpha 2. > > PPS: We could also skip Alpha 1, opt in on Alpha 2, and then skip Alpha 3. > > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
