On 05/23/2013 02:10 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Lance your right on the 2 three-gaps in the schedule. The schedule was > really hard to keep the 2 week going with the odd scheduling of the > alpha's and freeze, etc. This was supposed to be changed by the > release team, but until/if it does I think this should meet our needs > nicely. In addition, we're tossing around the idea of tracking > important packages all cycle, so the milestones on these weeks would > never be closed anyway :-) See the thread on the ubuntu-quality > mailing list. > > Nicholas
Thanks Nicholas. That should be enough info for the team to make a decision. Lance
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
