All the alternates have been respun and marked as ready for release, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily/current/saucy-alternate-i386.list etc. shows that they contain the correct kernel. The bug has been marked fix released and is now not mentioned in the release notes at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Alpha2/Lubuntu
Regards, Phill. On 25 July 2013 12:52, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Phill, > > I'm looking forward to the second re-spin :-) > > Best regards > Nio > > On 2013-07-25 13:42, Phill Whiteside wrote: > > Hi, > > > > well spotted, for some reason the alternates did not get the 2nd respin > > when the kernel changed. This is being done now. All the test results > > will stand and the gremlin mentioned in the -4 kernel will not be > > mentioned in the release notes :) > > > > Thanks for all the work on this one! > > > > Regards, > > > > Phill. > > > > On 25 July 2013 11:56, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I suggest a respin of the 32-bit alternate iso changing the kernel > from > > 3.10.0-4 to 3.10.0-5, which would solve several problems, maybe even > > your show stopper, Lance. > > > > If too late for the Alpha 2, I'm eagerly awaiting the next daily > build. > > > > Best regards > > Nio > > > > On 2013-07-25 12:25, Lance wrote: > > > It seems that this is going to take some time to resolve :^) > > > > > > We always mention in the release notes that "this is an alpha so > > expect > > > bugs". > > > > > > ATM I sort of think this time we should say something like: > > > > > > "Due to recent kernel and xorg changes we know that the alpha 2 > images > > > are finicky (could use the word "problematic") with some hardware. > > We're > > > continuing to look into this issue, but if you can't boot the live > > image > > > to a working DE we recommend not installing this alpha 2 image". > > > > > > That's a rough draft. > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > *From:* Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> > > > *To:* Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>> > > > *Cc:* Jonathan Marsden <jmars...@fastmail.fm > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm>>; Phill Whiteside > > > <phi...@ubuntu.com>; lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net>>; Lars > > > Noodén <lars.noo...@gmail.com <mailto:lars.noo...@gmail.com>> > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:35 AM > > > *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Prepping for the last upgrade test > > > > > > I'm glad you can install the server Lance. > > > > > > I guess you mean that it works in your VIA computer. One more > > thing that > > > works :-) > > > > > > And yes, we might have different problems. Phill and I might also > have > > > different problems ... or two or three of us have the same problem. > > > > > > Could it be that some package comes as a different version from > > the iso > > > compared to via the network? So that we share the problem with > Lars? I > > > think this is the case with the kernel (which makes a difference > with > > > zRAM). Could there be some other package too? > > > > > > Best regards > > > Nio > > > > > > On 2013-07-25 10:59, Lance wrote: > > >> The server image worked OK so it's likely an Xorg bug. > > >> > > >> But Nio is having trouble too: > > >> > > >> > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1203852 > > >> > > >> I sort of think that we're having two different problems but I'm > > not sure. > > >> > > >> Lance > > >> > > >> PS: sorry for the top posting but I have a hardware mess right > now so > > >> I'm just "getting by" :^( > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> *From:* Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com> > > <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>>> > > >> *To:* Jonathan Marsden <jmars...@fastmail.fm > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm> > > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm>>>; > > Phill Whiteside > > >> <phi...@ubuntu.com <mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com > > <mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com>>> > > >> *Cc:* lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> > > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net>>> > > >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:54 AM > > >> *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Prepping for the last upgrade test > > >> > > >> I'd never tried a server daily image. > > >> > > >> For that matter I haven't installed a server image since maybe > > 2007 :^( > > >> > > >> So far I've tried the Xubuntu Alpha 2 image and I know it fails > too. > > >> > > >> I have also captured some screenshots with my camera, but this > > may take > > >> a while. > > >> > > >> Anyway I'm trying this server image now: > > >> > > >> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/pending/ > > >> > > >> It shows last updated 07/25 so I'll see what happens. > > >> > > >> Lance > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> *From:* Jonathan Marsden <jmars...@fastmail.fm > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm> > > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm>>> > > >> *To:* Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com> > > <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>>>; Phill > > > Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com <mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com > > <mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com>>> > > >> *Cc:* lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> > > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net>>> > > >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:11 PM > > >> *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Prepping for the last upgrade test > > >> > > >> Lance, > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Lance wrote: > > >> > > >>> So, I need to figure out if it's the kernel or X > > ................... that > > >>> could take a while. > > >> > > >> Boot and install Ubuntu Server. If that works, the kernel is OK > :) > > >> > > >> You could also use the mini.iso if you prefer. > > >> > > >> Jonathan > > >> -- > > >> Jonathan Marsden > > >> jmars...@fastmail.fm <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm> > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm>> > > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm> > > <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm <mailto:jmars...@fastmail.fm>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
