Hi Lance, As you may, or may not be aware of...
following on from my going into full rant mode over an issue, I resigned from most areas. Such is the price of caring and getting totally frustrated. I can ask on the bug team, but as this appears to be an upstream (x-org) issue for out-dated kit, I'm not sure what I can I do. I lieu of the of all the years you have been a tester, I will ask on your behalf as to if there is any hope of the bug being actioned. I promise, I will ask politely :) Take good care, friend, Phill. On 27 September 2013 00:43, Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote: > The bug is filed and confirmed: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1205643 > > It's worked since Gutsy but no more, and I maintain 23 boxes with that > graphics chip :^( > > It still worked in Saucy Alpha 1 but not since then. > > Lance > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> > *To:* Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> > *Cc:* lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> > *Sent:* Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:28 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Apport malfunction or PCManFM bug? > > Hi Lance, > > in a previous email, I did ask for people to overview > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta2/Lubuntu > > I have no objection to a mention of VIA graphics, but as I'm sure you > appreciate when a bug is filed we do like to at least try and find a > work-around as opposed to "This will just not work, sorry..." If there is > no way around it, then we can are left with the mention that "VIA xyz chips > are not supported". > > Sorry mate, but that's the best we can do, > > Phill. > P.S. there is always a chance of mentioning on what last release they did > work with lubuntu. > > > On 27 September 2013 00:10, Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Thanks Phill. > > Off-topic, but I am now running an i386 standard upgrade test just to be > sure we're not borked in that regard :^) > > BTW did you decide to mention in the release notes that some VIA graphics > chips are borked? I wish I could get a reply from someone at Xorg on that > bug :^( > > Lance > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> > *To:* Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> > *Cc:* lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> > *Sent:* Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:50 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Apport malfunction or PCManFM bug? > > I've also see it with chromium, now that beta-2 is completed, next time I > get a false alarm, I'll add it and link it to your bug report. If others > can also add such false alarms, we can bring it to the attention of the > team who look after the crash reports. > > regards, > > Phill. > > > On 23 September 2013 17:43, Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > As we head into Beta 2 testing I decided to test the heck out of all apps > and encountered this: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcmanfm/+bug/1229181 > > I personally think it's a sensitivity issue with apport rather than a > PCManFM bug but wanted to share that. > > Lance > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > > > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
