I'm still somewhat confused as to why more tests are needed? The set I carried out for Chad Miller were a full set of tests. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+/chromium-bsourcerowser/+bug/1096603 If he asks for further tests under what ever system he requires, he knows to ask. The bug is assigned to him, and he has recently posted up http://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/1ernda/some_more_reasons_for_sticking_with_firefox_as/ca5gmf9
Do we, as lubuntu, support losing 32 bit? No, we do not. Allow Chad to make the call on whether v27 is viable for us. He knows a lot more about this area than any of us :) Regards, Phill. On 1 June 2013 23:15, Yorvyk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/06/13 23:06, Andre Rodovalho wrote: > >> Another test: >> >> Facebook only: Firefox: 134.30 MB Chromium: 127784k >> >> Facebook + Gmail: Firefox: 278.01 MB Chromium: 139352k >> >> My Firefox has some extentions (xMarks, Flash Video Downloader, >> Ubuntu Mod. and Global Menu...) >> >> Chromium has no extentions! >> >> >> >> Which makes the figures somewhat meaningless. It's easy to run FF with > out extensions. Look in the Help menu there is an option to restart FF > with Add-ons Disabled. This will give comparative figures. > > > > -- > > > Steve > > > -- > Lubuntu-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/** > mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users > > -- > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >
-- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
