On Fri, Jul 5, 2013, at 03:44 PM, Mr Wislr wrote: > it should simply be two options
Why? Who are you to say how many options other people will want to create, or will want to have available? If they are good, and can be added to Lubuntu without using too much disk space or RAM or effort from the developers, and they are of benefit to some fraction of potential Lubuntu users... why not have ten themes, or even twenty themes? Windows XP itself has more than two! > provide an mac like alternative layout and your done. > > otherwise you will be doing this all day, lubuntu unity style, lubuntu > kde style, lubuntu gnome style, lubuntu cinnamon style. If other people want to do the work of creating such themes and in the end we decide they are good enough to be included in a package of such themes for Lubuntu... why not let them? Who does it harm? You may not want to spend time on this. I don't plan to spend my time on it, either! But that does not and should not prevent those who *do* want to spend time on making Lubuntu "prettier" like this from doing so. I'd rather we have twenty themes/sessions/templates available, and then (somehow) choose the best five or ten of them to be officially available in Lubuntu, than that we artificially limit things to "just Lubuntu and OSX, done" before thing really get started. Let people who enjoy this stuff have fun doing it -- it is harmless :) Jonathan -- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
