+1 On 05/09/16 21:33, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > Having it be exclusively on Facebook makes no sense. Make a Doodle poll > or something of the sort and link it to all the places. > > On May 9, 2016 7:31 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 7,769 members > <https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/members/>(102 new) > <https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/#> > > just under 8,000 people.. let the vote go for 24 hours and we will > accept it. > > The question: > Hi follks, As lubutnu moves from GTK (current) to Qt (LXQt) I > propose that we also move our wiki system to MediaWiki and have the > moinmoin wiki for the GTK variants. > +1 is for us setting up the new wiki area for Qt > -1 is for us keep using moinmoin untill it gets moved to MediaWiki > Is that fair? > > > On 10 May 2016 at 03:24, Phill. Whiteside <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I was not aware it was a vote.... let me set one up for everyone > to be aware of. > > Phillw > > On 10 May 2016 at 03:22, Walter Lapchynski <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > So what I hear is, on the proposal of making a separate wiki > server for LXQt, the voting is as follows: > > In favor: 1 > Against: 2 > > How does everyone else vote? > > On May 9, 2016 7:18 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Walter, > > we have exactly ONE page for LXQt.... How is having two > operating systems running side by side a better case of > having two wiki areas? We are committed to Qt and it > appears Ubuntu are committed to moving from Moinmoin to > MediaWiki. Have a look > at > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Developers/PrePostReleaseTODO > and tell me how the hell am I supposed to add in LXQt > running along side the GTK ones... > > In my heart, I cannot see any reason NOT to have LXQt on > the newer MediaWiki system and keep our LTS's etc on > moin. This does give everyone just under 18 months to > decide if we go to Qt or not. Alf is quietly confident > that it will be ready, and I do have faith in him and > Julien > > As for maintaining?... We will have an official release > (GTK) and a community respin (Qt). This may be new to > some, but us old wrinklies remember them. > > There is no better time for lubuntu to run dual wiki > systems as to when we are running dual ISO's and ensure > bugs are reported to the correct version. > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 10 May 2016 at 02:52, Walter Lapchynski > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > You seem to be missing the fact that we all agree > that MediaWiki is better than Moin. I don't want two > wikis to have to maintain. If we can have someone > else do the work of securing and maintaining our > wiki, it's less for us to deal with. It would be the > same for our WordPress site of we let Canonical > host. The issue is not the money, nor is it being > against everything you do. It's about limiting the > strain on the entire team. > > On May 9, 2016 6:24 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Why do you think lubuntu.me <http://lubuntu.me> > is not hosted with canonical, yet they did the > trade mark registration? They are paying for the > domain and the hosting comes free..... I'll chat > to Alf and Julien about what wiki structure is > best, writing up a wiki structure in moin that > is not compatible with MediaWiki is foolish. Any > one who thinks Canonical IS are smarter than > Fedora guys is foolish. They posted their notes > up so as to help others facing the nightmare. > > But, as the two of you are 100% against > everything I suggest, I'll just go 'meh' and > work with debian-lxqt which you may find is the > upstream requirements for lubuntu-lxqt. > > Kindest Regards, > > Phill. > > On 10 May 2016 at 02:14, Walter Lapchynski > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I'm up for what the boss, i.e. the team, > agrees on, too. My vote is to continue to > use Moin. Ubuntu is done with it and are > working on fixing the scripts so they can > move entirely over to MediaWiki. Everything > already on Moin will get magically > converted. If we make our own thing, we have > administrative overhead to deal with. > > It's bad enough we don't have Canonical > paying for our domain and dealing with our > hosting. While we're at it can we fix that, > too? > > On May 9, 2016 6:08 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Well, > > it is vote time. I'm for not the fact > that even fedora devs had a makeshift > script to convert things from moin to > mediawiki[1] Any one wanting to make a > new project under moinmoin is making for > more work in the future. But, I'm up for > what the boss says. > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MoinMoin > Is such a pain in the butt. > > On 10 May 2016 at 01:58, Simon Quigley > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > IMHO we should write everything in > MoinMoin then wait for the > conversion so people can still view > the wiki now and continue to hack on > it but when the conversion runs, we > have everything already available > and set in place. > > -- > Simon Quigley > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > tsimonq2 on Freenode > > > > -- > Lubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-devel > > > > >
-- Simon Quigley [email protected] tsimonq2 on Freenode -- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
