Hi Walter, I think you will find an email.... I am not totally unfamiliar with online voting systems :)
Regards, Phill. On 10 May 2016 at 04:01, Walter Lapchynski <[email protected]> wrote: > Doodle is a polling mechanism that anyone can participate in, so got can > include whomever you want with nothing more than a link. I'll set it up for > you if you're unfamiliar. > On May 9, 2016 7:58 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Walter, > > does Doodle have just under 8,000 people and similar for the facebook page > (15,000) > > But, i follow orders.... > > On 10 May 2016 at 03:33, Walter Lapchynski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Having it be exclusively on Facebook makes no sense. Make a Doodle poll >> or something of the sort and link it to all the places. >> On May 9, 2016 7:31 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 7,769 members >>> <https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/members/>(102 new) >>> <https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/#> >>> >>> just under 8,000 people.. let the vote go for 24 hours and we will >>> accept it. >>> >>> The question: >>> Hi follks, As lubutnu moves from GTK (current) to Qt (LXQt) I propose >>> that we also move our wiki system to MediaWiki and have the moinmoin wiki >>> for the GTK variants. >>> +1 is for us setting up the new wiki area for Qt >>> -1 is for us keep using moinmoin untill it gets moved to MediaWiki Is >>> that fair? >>> >>> >>> On 10 May 2016 at 03:24, Phill. Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I was not aware it was a vote.... let me set one up for everyone to be >>>> aware of. >>>> >>>> Phillw >>>> >>>> On 10 May 2016 at 03:22, Walter Lapchynski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So what I hear is, on the proposal of making a separate wiki server >>>>> for LXQt, the voting is as follows: >>>>> >>>>> In favor: 1 >>>>> Against: 2 >>>>> >>>>> How does everyone else vote? >>>>> On May 9, 2016 7:18 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Walter, >>>>>> >>>>>> we have exactly ONE page for LXQt.... How is having two operating >>>>>> systems running side by side a better case of having two wiki areas? We >>>>>> are >>>>>> committed to Qt and it appears Ubuntu are committed to moving from >>>>>> Moinmoin >>>>>> to MediaWiki. Have a look at >>>>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Developers/PrePostReleaseTODO and >>>>>> tell me how the hell am I supposed to add in LXQt running along side the >>>>>> GTK ones... >>>>>> >>>>>> In my heart, I cannot see any reason NOT to have LXQt on the newer >>>>>> MediaWiki system and keep our LTS's etc on moin. This does give everyone >>>>>> just under 18 months to decide if we go to Qt or not. Alf is quietly >>>>>> confident that it will be ready, and I do have faith in him and Julien >>>>>> >>>>>> As for maintaining?... We will have an official release (GTK) and a >>>>>> community respin (Qt). This may be new to some, but us old wrinklies >>>>>> remember them. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no better time for lubuntu to run dual wiki systems as to >>>>>> when we are running dual ISO's and ensure bugs are reported to the >>>>>> correct >>>>>> version. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Phill. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10 May 2016 at 02:52, Walter Lapchynski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You seem to be missing the fact that we all agree that MediaWiki is >>>>>>> better than Moin. I don't want two wikis to have to maintain. If we can >>>>>>> have someone else do the work of securing and maintaining our wiki, it's >>>>>>> less for us to deal with. It would be the same for our WordPress site >>>>>>> of we >>>>>>> let Canonical host. The issue is not the money, nor is it being against >>>>>>> everything you do. It's about limiting the strain on the entire team. >>>>>>> On May 9, 2016 6:24 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you think lubuntu.me is not hosted with canonical, yet they >>>>>>>> did the trade mark registration? They are paying for the domain and the >>>>>>>> hosting comes free..... I'll chat to Alf and Julien about what wiki >>>>>>>> structure is best, writing up a wiki structure in moin that is not >>>>>>>> compatible with MediaWiki is foolish. Any one who thinks Canonical IS >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> smarter than Fedora guys is foolish. They posted their notes up so as >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> help others facing the nightmare. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But, as the two of you are 100% against everything I suggest, I'll >>>>>>>> just go 'meh' and work with debian-lxqt which you may find is the >>>>>>>> upstream >>>>>>>> requirements for lubuntu-lxqt. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kindest Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Phill. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10 May 2016 at 02:14, Walter Lapchynski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm up for what the boss, i.e. the team, agrees on, too. My vote >>>>>>>>> is to continue to use Moin. Ubuntu is done with it and are working on >>>>>>>>> fixing the scripts so they can move entirely over to MediaWiki. >>>>>>>>> Everything >>>>>>>>> already on Moin will get magically converted. If we make our own >>>>>>>>> thing, we >>>>>>>>> have administrative overhead to deal with. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's bad enough we don't have Canonical paying for our domain and >>>>>>>>> dealing with our hosting. While we're at it can we fix that, too? >>>>>>>>> On May 9, 2016 6:08 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> it is vote time. I'm for not the fact that even fedora devs had a >>>>>>>>>> makeshift script to convert things from moin to mediawiki[1] Any one >>>>>>>>>> wanting to make a new project under moinmoin is making for more work >>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>> future. But, I'm up for what the boss says. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MoinMoin >>>>>>>>>> Is such a pain in the butt. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10 May 2016 at 01:58, Simon Quigley <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IMHO we should write everything in MoinMoin then wait for the >>>>>>>>>>> conversion so people can still view the wiki now and continue to >>>>>>>>>>> hack on it >>>>>>>>>>> but when the conversion runs, we have everything already available >>>>>>>>>>> and set >>>>>>>>>>> in place. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Simon Quigley >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> tsimonq2 on Freenode >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Lubuntu-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-devel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >
-- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
