Karl,

I don't see a problem with developing this directly in Lucene's CVS tree.
My only concern is that you make sure the checked in code always compiles
without errors.  Does anyone disagree?

Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl �ie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 AM
> To: Doug Cutting
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Norwegian stemmer.
> 
> 
> Hello, my name is Karl �ie and me and Kenneth Aastr�m is working on a
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.no package to provide lucene with 
> a Norwegian
> analysis package (as we are norwegians...). We have based our 
> implementation
> on the Snowball project
> (http://snowball.sourceforge.net/norwegian/stemmer.html), and 
> we are almost
> finished with a working version.
> 
> As for this we of course want to contribute this package back 
> to lucene but
> we don't have a local common cvs repository. Can we use the 
> lucene cvs for
> development? if not we will break out a sourceforge.net project for
> development and submit working versions to you.
> 
> What is the best approach for this?
> 
> mvh Karl �ie
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to