On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 15:20, Doug Cutting wrote: > > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Would the demos be pre-compiled in the distribution? > > I think they are currently. If they're not, they should be. >
It shall be done. > > As for packaging it in org.apache.lucene.demo in addition to > > keeping it > > in a separate jar (and hence under demo instead of java), I think that > > would be a good idea. Am I following you? > > Yes. That is what I meant. Sorry I wasn't more clear. The code should > continue to live in src/demo, they should not be bundled into the core > Lucene jar file, and the java package name should be > "org.apache.lucene.demo". It would be great if you could do this. > You got it. -Andy > Doug > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
