Is this open source? APL'd? Where can I look at it?
On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 22:00, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I've developed something similar myself. I've created an Ant task <index>
> that uses DocumentHandler interface implementing classes - one that can be
> used (<index class="...">) is a FileExtensionDocumentHandler. At build-time
> I generate a Lucene index of static documents, and roll that into a web
> application.
>
> Its got some kinks, like how to deal with the documents because they contain
> relative hyperlinks... so these documents either should be copied into the
> WAR too (or somehow made accessible to the web app) or incorporated directly
> into a Lucene field ("rawcontents" is what I'm using now). These issues are
> not tough to solve and having some additional parameters to my IndexTask
> could allow such things to be customized by the user.
>
> My task is still evolving, but my plan all along has been to donate it to
> lucene-dev for incorporation in some form or another.
>
> Let me know if you'd like it, and what package name you'd like to use.
>
> Erik
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kelvin Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for Lucene
>
>
> Great suggestions all around, and I'm pretty much in agreement with what's
> been said.
>
> In my app, I've built a mini-framework around the searching such that I'm
> able to map ContentHandlers (which index file contents) to file extensions.
> I've been wanting to clean it up and contribute it for awhile, but haven't
> overcome the intertia to do so. Also introduced a DataSource (which can
> pretty much be anything, like a filesystem, a database, a URL, etc) from
> which to obtain the data to index, so I think it _could_ be inline with what
> some of you have in mind.
>
> I could also use alot of feedback with what's been done too...
>
> So what's the plan to move forward?
>
> K
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Tucker
> To: Lucene Developers List
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 4:03 AM
> Subject: RE: Proposal for Lucene
>
>
> I like what you included in your proposal and suggest doing all that (over
> time) and taking the following into consideration:
>
> Indexers/Crawlers
>
> General Settings
> SleeptimeBetweenCalls - can be used to avoid flooding a machine with too
> many requests
> IndexerTimeout - kill this crawler thread after long period of inactivity
> IncludeFilter - include only items matching filter
> ExcludeFilter - exclude items matching filter (can be used with
> IncludeFilter)
> MaxItems - stops indexing after x items
> MaxMegs - stops indexing after x MB of data
>
> File System Indexer
> URLReplacePrefix - can crawl c:\ but expose URL as http://mysever/docs/
>
> Web Indexer
> HTTPUser
> HTTPPassword
> HTTPUserAgent
> ProxyServer
> ProxyUser
> ProxyPassword
> HTTPSCertificate
> HTTPSPrivateKey
>
> Other Possible Indexers
> Microsoft Exchange 5.5/2000
> Lotus Notes
> Newsgroup (NNTP)
> Documentum
> ODBC/OLEDB
> XML - index single XML that represents multiple documents
>
>
> Document Factory
> General
> The minimum properties for each document should be:
> URL
> Title
> Abstract
> Full Text
> Score
>
> HTML
> Support for META tags including Dublic Core syntax
>
> Other Possible Document Factories
> Office Docs - DOC, XLS, PPT
> PDF
>
>
> Thanks for the great proposal.
>
> Mark Tucker
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:35 AM
> To: Lucene Developers List
> Subject: Proposal for Lucene
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is just a few thoughts about Lucene. Please send me your feedback,
> critiques and thought.
>
> If you folks would take a look:
>
> http://www.trilug.org/~acoliver/luceneplan.html
>
> if you'd like to submit patches:
>
> http://www.trilug.org/~acoliver/luceneplan.xml
>
> Once I've gotten feedback from the developer community I'll send this to
> the user community as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
> --
> www.superlinksoftware.com
> www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html
> - fix java generics!
>
>
> The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
> vote.
> -Ambassador Kosh
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
www.superlinksoftware.com
www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html
- fix java generics!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
