> Why not use XML? The goldem hammer strikes again...
<rant> XML is my nominee for "most over-applied technology of the year." Its good for some things. Rotten for others. Used for everything. And the decision to use XML is often made long before anyone thinks about (a) what will we be representing and (b) who will be using it. </rant> The textual representation of the transformation is a pretty small part of the problem that Rodrigo was discussing. Once the transformation framework has been fleshed out, XML may or may not be a sensible and compact way of representing it. > There are some issues with the characters you use, but using XML > might make it easier to extend. Might. And might not. Might make it harder to use. Might simply get in the way. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
