On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:47, Dmitry Serebrennikov wrote: > Victor Hadianto wrote: > Yes, generally, there are two answers -- either make all fields stored > or use some other database for the storage of the "master" documents.
Thanks Dimtry for pointing this out, well I now I am sure that we can't do it. I think the second approach might be more acceptable in our situation, it does have a little bit of performance impact when recreating the document to the index but should work. > I suppose it might be possible to add a lower-level support for > extracting the terms from the unstored fields of the initial document > and re-indexing them for the new document... Well now this is interesting, dare I hope that any Lucene guru is interested doing this :D Regards, > Dmitry. Victor Hadianto NUIX Pty Ltd Level 8, 143 York Street, Sydney 2000 Phone: (02) 9283 9010 Fax: � (02) 9283 9020 This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or attachment is strictly prohibited. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
