On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:52:01PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do get me wrong, I did read the Parser Syntax, and understand that:
> "Note: You cannot use a * or ? symbol as the first character of a search."  
> However, It would have been nice for this feature.  I made the following 
> changes to QueryParser.jj, and it seems work fine.  I am not sure if there is 
> any side effect though.  Can someone verify this?

I think this is a bad idea.  

First of all, the query parser is a CONVENIENCE, not the only way to
build query objects.  If the query parser language is too restrictive,
then build the query objects programmatically.  Its not that hard.

There were reasons why the query language was designed this way.  If
you think that's an error, first you need to lobby for your position
to change the design, THEN we can think about changing the parser.

Parser are tricky.  Small changes can have big, unexpected effects.
Lets make sure we want to do this first (which I think we don't), and
then we can look at the implementation. 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to