On Tuesday 25 February 2003 10:41, Doug Cutting wrote: > none none wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:04:30 > > > > Doug Cutting wrote: ... > So, Tatu, if you do get to implementing your proposal, please take this > into account. There are potentially two different things that folks > might want: (1) the list of terms which are literally in the query, > e.g., "foo*" for a wildcard query; (2) the list of indexed terms which > match clauses in the query, e.g., "fool" and "foosball" for the query > "foo*". The latter is considerably more expensive to compute, but might > be more useful in term highlighting. (Note that you could do term > highliting without this, by matching terms in the text directly to the > wildcarded pattern.)
Yes, actually I started thinking the same thing after reading your previous explanation about wild card terms... there are two distinct use cases to cover. -+ Tatu +- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
