On Wednesday 19 March 2003 13:39, David Birtwell wrote: > On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 03:26 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Shall we take a vote? Should the snowball analyzers be included in > > the base lucene jar file, or should they continue to be packaged > > separately? .. > It might seem cleaner from a design perspective to put the Snoball > analyzers in a second package, but I believe it would feel better to a > new Lucene user to have them folded into the base Lucene jar, or at > least distributed with the base Lucene download. The analyzers will > feel more "sanctioned" that way and I believe users would have more > confidence using them. Plus, it would be one less step to get started > with Lucene. > > It's like Ant and optional.jar. We all want to use JUnit tasks. Why > should we all be forced to download and install optional.jar? ;-)
As long as it's on separate jar I'm fine either way. I don't think those classes should be put in 'main' lucene jar. -+ Tatu +- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
