Sounds wrong, but I have not used HitCollector much, so maybe I just
don't know enough about it. Regardless, it looks like this should be
entered in Bugzilla. If it is not a bug in the code, it is a bug in
documentation - this type of behaviour, if correct, we need to document
clearly.
Thanks,
Otis
P.S.
I don't remember seeing any unit tests that use HitCollector. If
you've go something in a unit test format, please attach it to the bug,
so we can include it in the test suite.
--- "Armbrust, Daniel C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed an oddity in scoring....
>
> If I do my search like this:
>
> searcher.search(query, filter, new HitCollector()
> {
> public void collect(int doc, float score)
> {
> tempHits.add(new LuceneHits(doc, score));
> }
> });
>
>
> I get different scores for the resulting documents than I do if I do
> my search like this:
>
> hits = searcher.search(query, filter);
>
> Both methods return the same number of hits. I can live with them
> returning different scores, I'm just curious as to why it happens.
>
> Furthermore, the first method returns several scores that are greater
> than 1.0. Isn't this supposed to be impossible? The FAQ states that
> scores range from 0 to 1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]