> Roughly, a 20% speedup > > > In my case and with my hardware configuration, the index > > is too big to be loaded in memory with RAMDirectory. > > On a smaller index or with less RAM available FSDirectory should be > > faster? >
On a very heavily buffering system (like e.g linux) I would not expect more difference than this 20%. The main difference is not that either is in memory the other is not in, but the access is throuh inode or page mapped IO (booth from memory, mostly). That takes the difference. (At least I think so.) incze --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
