+1, is there a single coherent well-considered argument for supporting 1.1? It seems yet another one of those inexplicable apachisms ;)
Terry Steichen said: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Tucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:03 AM > Subject: Re: JDK compatibility (Collections API) > > >> We've found that Lucene essentially requires JDK 1.3.1 or later >> because of some VM bugs in 1.3.0. Perhaps Lucene would also work with >> 1.2.x VM's (we haven't tested)? However, trying to preserve >> compatability with 1.1.x seems just silly. It would be premature to >> require JDK 1.4.x, but virtually everyone uses 1.3 or 1.4. And, even >> though some small few don't, I don't think that's a good enough >> reason to shackle Lucene to a very old VM version. That's just my >> opinion though. :) > > +1 > > Regards, > > Terry > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
