I don't know if I replied to this or not. My opinion below. --- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 05:25 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > My vote goes to leaving it in the Sandbox, for the same reasons I > > mentioned the other day for some other similar component. > > > > As a matter of fact, I have been wondering if we should move > Russian > > and German code out of the core into the Sandbox. > > I would be +1 on moving it out too. But where do you draw the line > on what Analyzers go in the core, then?
I would keep only the 'core' ones (Whitespace/Simple/Standard), even if they have English-specific code in them. I hate assuming English as THE language, even though it is THE language in practise, but I don't see a better way of keeping language-specific code out of the core. In my opinion, an ideal setup would be to keep the W/S/S in the core, and all others in a Sandbox. Analyzers in the Sandbox would be nicely organized and would be in a stable state, so a simple 'ant jar' can package everything up and let the developer just move the created Jar to the appropriate directory in his environment. I would keep those contributed Analyzers separate from the Snowball ones, so their origins, etc. are clear. I have a Brasilian Portuguese Analyzer sitting in the queue (read: my email account's inbox), and I think I even have some code that somebody sent for Chinese, other than CJK support from Che Dong. This has been waiting for my free time for months now... :( Otis __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
