Thanks a lot for your help. I got it.

Have a nice day

Jianshuo

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:11:22 -0500, Tate Avery wrote:

> 
> 
> It appears that my system has 2.1 so this must have been what I used.  You can find 
> 2.1 here:
> 
> https://javacc.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=212
> 
> i.e. under 'old versions' on the javacc site.
> 
> Tate
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jianshuo Niu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: javacc2.0
> 
> 
> I tried javacc3.2 and failed. From lucenen user list, some one said it did
> work for javacc3.0 or higher. Could you tell me what version of javacc you
> are using and what is your experience of later verion javacc? I am a
> lucene user, not a developer.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jianshuo
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:03:28 -0500, Tate Avery wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I made changes to the QueryParser.jj (in 1.3-rc1) and recompiled it with a version 
>> of javacc later than 2.0.  I imagine that you will be able to recompile with a more 
>> recent version... no?  Have you tried?
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jianshuo Niu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:48 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: javacc2.0
>> 
>> 
>> Hi! There:
>> 
>> I modified the lucene1.3-rc1 and needs javacc2.0 to compile the source.
>> However, I could not find javacc2.0. Does anybody can help me out?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jianshuo
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to