Nevermind.... my test is not for prefix or wildcard query, but it does show that TooManyClauses can be thrown from QueryParser.parse, which I still feel deserves a ParseException.
I agree. I don't object to your patch, but just wanted to note that it doesn't address the original issue.
As for the original issue: if we change it to a checked exception, unless it is a subclass of IOException, all Lucene applications would have to change to accomodate this, which I don't think is acceptable.
So, if folks would like to make this a checked exception, then I guess we could make it an IOException. But that rubs me the wrong way, as it doesn't really involve i/o, but is rather more like ArrayOutOfBounds, BufferOverflowException. or UnsupportedOperationException, etc., which are all (unchecked) subclasses of RuntimeException. So my preference would be to leave it as a RuntimeException. This will bite a few folks who've been (probably unknowingly) using prefix queries that generate over 1000 matches, but these folks were also about to run into mysterious slowdowns and OutOfMemory exceptions. I'd rather they got TooManyClauses first, increase the limit, and then get slowdowns and OutOfMemory. That way they'll better understand why they're experiencing problems.
The fellow who originally complained was able to figure out what was going on, and how to prevent it by increasing the limit. He was just unhappy that he had to change something when he upgraded. So this is was not a serious bug, just an annoyance. Let's not force every user of Lucene to update their code for an incompatible change (i.e., annoy lots of people) in order to remove the annoyance of a few.
Doug
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]