oops ... thanks ... let me try again ...
> -----Original Message----- > From: none none [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:41 PM > To: Lucene Developers List > Subject: Re: arbitrary sorting > > > I can't see any zip file in the email, or is it just me? > bye > > --- > KorfuT > > --------- Original Message --------- > > DATE: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:21:56 > From: Tim Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Lucene Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > > >Erik et al, > > > >In the attached .zip are the files implementing the functionality I > >described. I ended up just putting the classes in the > >org.apache.lucene.search package - that makes the > constructor problem I > >mentioned not an issue. Therefore there's not a bug to post the code > >against, so I'm just attaching it here. Let me know if > there is something > >else I should do. > > > >For reference, it was the org.apache.lucene.search.TopDocs > which was the > >problem - I needed to call it from the SortedIndexSearcher I > created, but it > >can't be called from outside the org.apache.lucene.search package. > > > >The class to look at is > org.apache.lucene.search.SortedIndexSearcher. It > >contains some basic informatin about how to use it. > > > >I call this v0.1 because there are some constraints on the > fields used to > >sort - they must contain a single term which is an integer > value. If what > >I've done looks like a good direction to take in the API, > though, it would > >be possible to make the code able to handle arbitrary term > values, with a > >little worse performance. > > > >Tim > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:56 PM > >> To: Lucene List > >> Subject: Re: making a contribution > >> > >> > >> This is great news! > >> > >> Please attach your new files to a new Bugzilla issue for > Lucene (see > >> Jakarta website for details) and either submit a 'cvs diff > -u' patch > >> file along with the issue or just describe what > constructor needed to > >> be opened up to public in the issue text. > >> > >> Where your contribution would ultimately reside is > unclear. At the > >> very least, it can live in the sandbox if you are ok with > making it > >> Apache Software License. > >> > >> Erik > >> > >> On Jan 5, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Tim Jones wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I've come up with an implementation for doing arbitrary > sorting in > >> > lucene - > >> > it is an implementation of PriorityQueue that can sort by > >> an arbitrary > >> > field > >> > as well as the computed relevancy. It is quite speedy and > >> should be > >> > faster > >> > than doing a sort in the appplication after getting the > >> results back > >> > from > >> > lucene. > >> > > >> > I thought I'd make this available to the lucene > community - what is > >> > the best > >> > way to do this? Should it go in "Contributions", or "Sandbox"? > >> > > >> > The meat of it for version 0.1 is four classes which > >> subclass existing > >> > lucene classes, and one modification to an existing > lucene class to > >> > make the > >> > constructor public so it can be subclassed. So really what > >> it means is > >> > adding additional API by "jar -uf lucene.jar ..." > >> > > >> > Tim > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! > http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
