Robert Engels wrote:
I can work the LRU into the code base - my imp does not use the
LinkedHashMap, but rather a HashMap and an associated LinkedList, so there
would not be any 1.4 issues. Since the index is never rewritten, and if the
cache is per Index, I do not need to worry about a stale cache, correct?

That's correct.


Note that performance-related patches must be accompanied by benchmarks which demonstrate that they provide a clear overall performance improvement on non-toy-sized indexes.

Doug


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to