DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763 [PATCH] Language guesser contribution Summary: [PATCH] Language guesser contribution Product: Lucene Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Other AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I'd like to contribute this language guesser to Lucene. It contains language guessing interfaces and classes as well as trigram specific classes and some language reference files I generated myself using the trigram file generation utily in there. I included a unit test as well. I didn't do any extensive tests on guessing quality and performance but I would tend to think that they are both OK for a first pass. I thought about writing a custom Analyzer for this but realized that this wouldn't be the way to go and that probably the language decision should be left to the developper, definitely when the Analyzer is used to tokenize a query. Have fun, Jean-François Halleux --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
