DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702 [PATCH] arbitrary sorting ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-12 18:41 ------- >Is there a reason why you pass a SortField[] rather than a Sort in >Searchable#search()? I guess I just followed our previous discussion, and didn't add the Sort class until I was trying to figure out how to make it easier for a user of the API. The TopFieldDocs search (Query q, Filter f, int n, SortField[] fields) in Searchable is "lower level" ... It can go either way, I suppose - I'll look at it again. Is your initial preference to make them the same? Thanks for noting the lack of Serializable. any other thoughts? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
