On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:26:45PM -0800, Doug Cutting wrote: > Incze Lajos wrote: > >I've prepared sortkeys for some fields and designated > >them to be unindexed, untokenized and stored. But I've > >experienced exceptions, the sortkeys work only if their > >field is indexed as well. > > > >Are there technical reasons or is this a bug? > > There are technical reasons. The new sorting code requires fields to be > indexed. Unless I am mistaken, whether or not they are stored does not > matter. Typically sort fields will be untokenized. > > Doug
So, the field (just created to act as a sorter) should be untokenized, not stored and indexed. Thanks. incze --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
