I think there may still be a bug in the new TermDocs.skipTo() implementation. Maybe it is related to BUG 27587 and 27799. However, it is very complicated to test.
Problem: In TermInfosReader index (every 128th term) skipOffsets are not stored! Due to documentation getIndexOffset returns the offset of the greatest index entry which is less than term. I believe this is not true it may deliver the term itself! If we seek for a term that is in the index, this term and its termInfo will not be read from the enumerator by scanEnum and consequently no skipOffset will be found, even if present. This could lead to serious problems when skipTo is used, couldnīt it?
Possible Solution: Store skipOffset in *.tii too.
What do you think? Christoph
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
