It doesn't have 'need' but it has plenty of others.... http://snowball.tartarus.org/english/stop.txt
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: more rigid stopword list ? Dear all, for my taste the stopwords included in Lucene (e.g. StopAnalyzer.ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS, wich is usually used with the SnowballAnalyzer - and I guess also with the StandardAnalyzer) is not strict enough: For example in a sentence with "we need ..." I would consider "we" and "need" as stopwords but they are not stripped by SnowballAnalyzer or StandardAnalyzer. Now: Is there an in-built solution to use more restrictive stripping or do I better create my own analyzer in that case with a more restrictive stopword list ? If so - are you aware of more rigid lists ? (a URI would be great !) Thanks, Holger ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
