Tim, Did these changes actually get incorporated into Lucene? If so, appreciate it if you could indicate which modules were changed (because I can't find any changes that appear to address this issue).
Regards, Terry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Lucene Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:52 PM Subject: Re: Sorting Messes up Scores > I just committed code changes to fix this. If for any reason you still see > a problem, please let me know. > > Tim > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Terry Steichen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:05 AM > > To: Lucene Developers List > > Subject: Sorting Messes up Scores > > > > > > When you use the new sorting features, the relevance scores > > get messed up. > > (A recent test showed most scores now range up to 3.0 or so.) As Tim > > suggests below, I'd like to know if fixing this is important > > to others. (It > > definitely is to me.) If so, I'll submit it as a bug. > > > > Regards, > > > > Terry > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
